Related posts:
- Inception Movie Review Inception Movie Review. Host Grace Randolph gives you the low-down...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Related posts:
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
RorschachPool said
June 16 2010 @ 4:22 pm
It was better then TF2, but was still just a rental (a fun rental, but a rental none-the-less).
algark said
June 16 2010 @ 4:48 pm
this is bullshit! this movie sucks balls!
8Honk8Honk8 said
June 16 2010 @ 5:34 pm
late cmt but i thought the movie was great. it was what GI Joe-ish and great if you liked GI Joe as a kid.
bobbob24able said
June 16 2010 @ 5:54 pm
@legocreator8633 the action distracted you from the god awful…well everything else
ngnikolaos said
June 16 2010 @ 6:34 pm
Aside from Cobra Commander, everything worked just fine. I really liked that movie. The Zartan ending was very nicely done.
Poesghost said
June 16 2010 @ 7:30 pm
Old review but this is what I want to say after watching this on DVD.
Go Joe but do not go see this movie!
Andybato said
June 16 2010 @ 8:00 pm
If the Comic-Book Guy from the t.v. show “The Simpsons” was real and existed; these are his words for this movie: “Worst. Movie. Ever.”
Shadowlit001 said
June 16 2010 @ 8:43 pm
This movie was shit. I’d rather watch an angry black man sodomize a penguin with a prosthetic leg.
mooonligght said
June 16 2010 @ 9:28 pm
Luv that little kid
ultimateblaze23 said
June 16 2010 @ 9:38 pm
cool im subscribing cause ur really pretty
ColemanAxelxr said
June 16 2010 @ 10:07 pm
No joke guys… just saw this for free on My Movie Share . com
Metroid02099 said
June 16 2010 @ 10:11 pm
Another mind-numbing piece of popcorn fluff and crap by the same CGI-centric Stephen Sommers. Milo had the only sense in that crowd, it definitely deserves a four.
EMstudios101 said
June 16 2010 @ 10:36 pm
Best directors of all time: Steven Speilberg, James Cameron( i didnt like avatar but he is still great), Peter Jackson, Rolland Emmerich, Christopher Nolan ( Dark Knight was a masterpiece), J J Abrams (i kinda like Mission Impossible 3),George Lucas, and maybe Michael Bay (transformers kinda sucked)
44excalibur said
June 16 2010 @ 10:52 pm
I don’t see why it should. Disney owns ABC, and they’ve been real good about letting the creators of “Lost,” Flash-Forward,” and “V” have as much creative freedom as they want. I don’t see why they would treat Marvel any differently.
jawehawk said
June 16 2010 @ 11:29 pm
I wonder if the fact that Disney bying Marvel, will have any effect on upcoming movies, like Iron Man 2, and the like?
44excalibur said
June 17 2010 @ 12:14 am
Yeah, I don’t like the insulting comments on youtube either. So few people can debate on these vids without resorting to that stuff. I agree somewhat on Nolan, and I do think that GI Joe could’ve got a better treatment. It took a loooong time for fans to get the Dark Knight, so who knows? I also thought Iron Man did a pretty good job of adapting the comic to the screen. I just wish the studios gave comics the respect they give popular novels, that’s all. Look at The Lord Of The Rings!
jawehawk said
June 17 2010 @ 12:44 am
Let me start by saying it’s nice to debate with someone, without having to insult one another. Don’t see to many people that comes with real arguements here on YT. On the topic of Nolan and the new Batman movies. I have to say that I rather disliked the first one. Where as I absolutely love The Dark Knight. And I can definately see what you’re getting at with the director of GI Joe, not doing enough to please the actual fans of GI Joe.
44excalibur said
June 17 2010 @ 1:15 am
Btw, I’m not upset with you. I appreciate your point of view. I’m upset with Hasbro and the studios for constantly denying fans for 25 years and counting. It’s frustrating to wait for someone to finally adapt the material and get it right.
44excalibur said
June 17 2010 @ 1:28 am
Of course, that’s what sequels are for! Nolan didn’t put the Joker in the first movie, did he? He waited for the second. And a lot of what I described was in the movie, just rearranged. They could have done it the right way and saved some stuff for the sequel. There is little difference between a comic book and a movie, just what the filmakers are willing to do and not wiling to do. Don’t make excuses for lazy writing. I’ll bet Chrisopher Nolan, Joss Whedon, or J.J, Abrams could’ve done better.
jawehawk said
June 17 2010 @ 2:06 am
I never said they got it right, I said they came up with fairly interesting charicters.
There is a big difference between a comic, and a movie. What your describing would take more than just 1 movie. Again this movie was about special effects, and giving the audience a fun time. If you can’t set aside the comic book, then of course you’re not going to like it. Don’t blaime the movie for that.
44excalibur said
June 17 2010 @ 2:27 am
Again, you know nothing about the comics so you don’t know that the “basic” info of the characters was all wrong. The Baroness was in love with Destro, not Duke. She blamed Snake Eyes for her brother’s death, not Duke. The Commander was a used car salesman before he stared Cobra and was not the Baroness’ brother. Snake Eyes is the one whose face and vocal chords were scarred in a helicopter accident; there was no vow of silence. And Scarlett is Snake Eyes’ lover. Still think they got it right?
jawehawk said
June 17 2010 @ 3:16 am
I’ve have never seen any of the GI Joe Comics, nor have I read the comics. Im not saying that the movie was great, but for pure entertainment, it was fun. I can understand why someone whos a fan of the comics or what not, might be annoyed. Though I think they made some nice charicters by using only the basic info of the origional charicters. The martial arts in the movie is awesome (You have to give the movie credit there?)
Again, it’s in no way a great movie. But it is a fun ride imo.
44excalibur said
June 17 2010 @ 3:19 am
@jawehawk I can tell by your comment that your only experience with GI Joe was the stupid cartoons. You obviously know nothing about the great and far superior Marvel comic book series by Larry Hama(Writer, Vietnam veteran, martial arts expert, firearms and demolitions specialist) or else you would never have made such a comment. The only people who are stupid are those who make uninformed statements. This movie was nowhere near faithful to the comics, and could have been much better.
aerosmith760 said
June 17 2010 @ 3:53 am
r u kidding it should be 1/10
the cgi was horrible and i mean bad its the samething if you just showed a turd for 2 or 1 and half hours dude their wasnt one thing that was its saving grace except for maybe the action sequnces whick were pretty nice like i mean it was worse than t2(not terminator 2)(transformers 2)
jawehawk said
June 17 2010 @ 4:51 am
So many kiddies, that can’t understand what GI Joe was about. It’s just fun action, with great CG effects. Nothing more, nothing less. Damn, people are stupid now-a-days.